Meeting Time: November 15, 2022 at 4:30pm PST

Agenda Item

8. 22-1257 Public Hearing: Actions on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), General Plan Amendment from Community Commercial to High Density Residential, Rezone from General Office (OG) to Planned Development (PD), and density bonus agreement to allow a multifamily affordable housing development with 108 rental units at 1601 Civic Center Drive (Continued from September 27, 2022)

   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
500 of 500 characters remaining
  • Default_avatar
    Matvei Iliunov about 2 years ago

    Our neighborhood is suffering from lack of parking slots. We are surrounded wide roads and we don’t have even playground for kids.

  • Default_avatar
    John Gueron about 2 years ago

    Please designate 1601 Civic Center Drive as parkland (severely deficient neighborhood) rather than a high-density project. A five-story building will create significant and irreversible effects on adjacent residents (e.g., noise, shadows, loss of privacy) and, more broadly, exacerbate existing parking issues (e.g., multiple cars park in red zones night after night).

  • Default_avatar
    Al Iriberri about 2 years ago

    Affordable housing is needed - but in a way that the neighborhood can logistically support - this project simply does not meet that standard.

  • Default_avatar
    Min Yang about 2 years ago

    This high density house will cause the current residents too much bad affects.

  • Default_avatar
    Fung Yi about 2 years ago

    I disagree with SCU Professor CJ Gabbe’s comment about the site is great for car-free living. We don’t have the leisure time to wait for a bus to go to work, hospital appointment or picking up kids from school. Santa Clara is a suburb for the most part and public transit is not as good as big cities like SF. A car is the most reliable transit mode for us working families. We need our cars and parking spaces, so as the future residents of 1601 CCD. I oppose this project for insufficient parking.

  • Default_avatar
    Xinyu Zou about 2 years ago

    I strongly oppose the project. The apartment and townhomes on Civic Center Dr already make it a high-density community, and the new project will make it even worse, not to mention how the new driveway will worsen the traffic on the road.

  • Default_avatar
    Daniel Cheng about 2 years ago

    Oppose, I'd love to support affordable housing but CH has not provided a good solution to any of the parking or congestion problems that will inevitably come up

  • Default_avatar
    Orit Skorka about 2 years ago

    Population density in our neighborhood is already high and parking is already a major problem. During evenings and night times, there are always cars that are parked in areas that are marked in red, where they shouldn't park for good reasons. A significant increase in population density without sufficient parking will only make things worse and can create very unsafe conditions.

  • Default_avatar
    Joe Jing about 2 years ago

    The neighborhood is already too crowded and the city has found the area to be below average in terms of park acreage per person. This project in its current form (108 units will insufficient assigned parking spaces per unit) will only exacerbate both of these issues.

  • Default_avatar
    Donata Makuta about 2 years ago

    Not sure whether my last vote went through. I oppose this effort. We already have enough low income housing projects planned or underway.

  • Default_avatar
    Ihab Badr about 2 years ago

    The following items should be adequately addressed
    1. Reduce density to 50%, and reduce the height to a maximum of 3 levels, and 30 degree viewing angles.
    2. There should be no driveway access to Civic Center Drive.
    3. The parking ratio for the project is inadequate. It should be addressed.

  • Default_avatar
    Bob Izet about 2 years ago

    We strongly oppose the new project , our 4 young children need a park .The new project will create a nightmare parking and traffic situation.

  • Default_avatar
    Ye Cao about 2 years ago

    I strongly oppose this proposal, the neighbor is already with high density and such 5-story 108 unit building will make the living environment even worse. Also the 18 month construction will bring noise, air pollution and cancel risk to the nearby residents. I do think we should find other more proper places to build such tall & high density building.

  • Default_avatar
    Avi S about 2 years ago

    I oppose this high density development. There are so many kids in this neighborhood who need a park to play. CH doesn't care for the quality of life for existing/ new residents. A lot of people are new to this neighborhood who have recently bought their houses in past 2 years. This neighborhood is already crowded and cannot afford such a high density project. We should seriously consider the impact and change either the location of the building or change the structure to low density 2-3 stories.

  • Default_avatar
    In Seok Hwang about 2 years ago

    Need to have moderate density and parking space comparing adjacent neighborhoods for quality of life.

  • Default_avatar
    VENEE CRUZ about 2 years ago

    Opposing high density development in 1601 CCD, 100% not suitable for CHD plan project proposal.
    CHD needs to lower density option, reduce height to a MAX of 3 levels,and 30 degree viewing angles.
    NO driveway plan onto CCD, due to grossly inadequate parking. Parking overflow will worsen congestion in our neighborhood .
    We believe in sustainable balanced development,and not Planned Development.
    Please protect our community quality of life,that makes us to move forward …
    Never give UP !

  • Default_avatar
    Jean Song about 2 years ago

    The land is way too small for 108 units. There is no sufficient parking. Why does everyone have to fight for parking and live in such an indecent way?

  • Default_avatar
    Shiqiu Zhang about 2 years ago

    I strongly oppose this high-density development. There are many kids being raised in our neighborhood. Too many traffic, very little playground for kids. The construction plan will cause air pollution and noisy streets, making the environment even worse.

  • Default_avatar
    Eric Lee about 2 years ago

    To date, Council has seen and heard the nearly universal local opposition to this CH project at 1601 CC Dr. If somehow the third-party, non-resident housing advocate opinions carry more weight than actual local residents who will have to live with this project as direct neighbors for decades to come, then I'm not sure what else can be said about this issue. I am strongly opposed to this proposal as it simply does not fit into the existing neighborhood and will decrease QoL for current residents.

  • Default_avatar
    Kevin Wang about 2 years ago

    I am living in 1700 Civic Center Unit #212. It is also extremely difficult to find a parking near my home and this problem is getting worse year over year. I can't afford to have another project bringing even more difficulty in parking. I oppose it loudly! This is affecting the quality of EVERYONE's life in the neighborhood!